|
|
||
|
| ||
| ||
| | ||
|
1) MARKET SUMMARY - Stocks once more give up most of an early gain, finish the week status quo.
| ||
|
Market Summary (continued)
The announcement of the auto deal came two days later than expected, but expected nonetheless. The Executive branch is throwing $13.4B in TARP funds at GM and Chrysler to keep them solvent a few more weeks. The market was relieved to get the word and futures moved higher. Earnings had something of a positive flavor with RIMM and ORCL bumping their outlooks more than expected. On the other hand PALM dropped the ball, ASML (chips) reduced its outlook, and CTAS (uniforms) missed. S&P downgraded eleven financial institutions including BAC, C, DB and GS. The financials are crushed for over a year, they finally start to bounce back some and S&P finally downgrades them. Good call guys.
Despite the negatives there was a solid rally off the open heading into midmorning. Oil was lower again as the January contract was routed (33.87, -2.35), the dollar bounced back for the second day, and gold continued its pullback after the Wednesday reversal (840.40, -20.20). Gold is interesting. It imploded in October, rebounded and gave us a decent gain with a GLD play we had, and finally made it up to the 200 day SMA this week. That is also a down trendline from the July and October peaks. It turned down right spot on at that trendline.
All of this pushed stocks higher through midmorning with the Dow putting in about 150 points. As on Thursday, however, midmorning turned the dial and the market could not hold onto the nice gains. A lunchtime to afternoon bounce stalled and the indices closed near the session lows. Even with that selloff the indices, sans DJ30, closed positive.
For the week stocks finished higher, aided once more by an early week surge. Just as with the prior week there was a strong start and then the action tapered off into Friday. That left the indices with some gains on the week but a quiet finish and not much farther along, definitely unable to take on the next key resistance level with the fade. No real issues with that; plenty of rest to make the move, and in good position to do it.
Here's a trade from "The Daily" and insights into our trading strategy:
Once more chips are reviled. Just heard on one of the after hours trade shows Thursday that the chips were finished, dead, forget ‘em. Funny. There are some nice patterns setting up and breaking higher here. Just banked a quick 11.5% stock and 41% option gain on part of a BRCM position, and looking to pick up more after this test on Thursday back to near support at the 10 day EMA. SMTC is in a very nice pattern as well, coming back with a nice test of the 50 day EMA after breaking higher the past two weeks.
Then there is RMBS. RMBS seems to have been involved in litigation since its inception. It was a poster child for the 1990’s tech avarice, rocketing from the thirties to over 300 from 1999 to early 2000. Then the tech crash and the unending litigation as it sues every chip maker on earth for patent and licensing violations. It won a lot of the cases, but even that did not insulate it from the second half 2008 meltdown. It sold off then tumbled lower in October. You know the story: the lazy but quiet ne’er to well next door turns violent.
Anyway, RMBS made a new low in late November, undercutting the October low. But then it bounced. And it bounced on volume. Another court victory? Well, yes. But talk about the timing. The entire market was bottoming as well. RMBS bolted higher on very strong volume. The move was strong enough that we were unable to take advantage of the first surge. As is always the case, however, a stock has to test a move, whether up or down. It faded on low volume toward the 50 day EMA it cleared, and we put it on the report, looking to catch it as it continued the break higher.
It gapped higher right after we put it on the report, and we moved in as it did, picking up some stock positions at $12.29 and some February $10 strike call options at $4.60. That is the move that jumpstarted the next leg, the second leg, of the run. Over the next seven sessions RMBS rallies straight up, moving to $15.98 on the high. On 12-17-08 things got volatile with a reach down to 14 and then a rebound back up to close at $15.75. With the run it had made, the volatility, and its proximity to the 200 day SMA at $16.30 (our initial target), we decided it was time to bank some gain. We sold some stock for $15.63, not the highest of the session, but a solid 27+% gain. We also cashed in some of the options for $6.70, $220 per contract or a 45+% gain. RMBS snugged up a bit more to the 200 day SMA as of Friday, but we are looking for a test of this move back toward the 10 day EMA near $14. That may produce another entry point.
This is a theme we have been playing with great success the past month and more: sentiment is so negative despite positive, building strength we are seeing in certain stocks, certain sectors, and indeed in the market itself. Universal revulsion, the kind that makes investors bleed billions out of their stocks funds and holdings, is the time to see if there is some market strength showing up. If it is, no matter what your predisposition is, no matter how much your stomach hurts at the thought of the stock market, no matter how strong the urge to throw your laptop through the window, take a look at some strong stocks and buy some when they start to bounce. You make some money once more and the shingles start falling from your eyes.
Stocks are just money making tools. They go up, they go down. The market was in a mode where you bought when the sellers bludgeoned stocks for a few days, then sold when the market shot higher for a day or two or three. Now there is a transition in progress and there are actual leaders with good patterns setting up and breaking higher from sound bases. This is the last link in a technical picture that has improved dramatically starting with the dry up of new lows on the November leg lower. When we see this and see stocks moving, we move in, checking our emotions at the door. We have already made a lot of money on this bounce, and at this juncture nothing has changed the picture such that we won’t make more money as the market makes another break higher off of last week’s test.
Learn more about "The Daily" with Stock Picks! - Issued 5 Times Per Week | ||
|
2) Stock Splits Playing stock splits can be very profitable, but it takes know-how. Our stock split service focuses on three main types of plays: 1) pre-announcement (where we forecast an upcoming split prior to the company making the announcement); 2) pre-split (these plays are made in the days leading up to the actual split day); and 3) post-split plays (plays made after the actual stock split where the stock is showing continued or renewed strength). For post-splits, we can play them as we would pre-splits (very short term), but we prefer to stretch our horizons, playing the trend. When playing options, we look further out, 2 or more months at least. We let the trend carry us along if there is one, but we will also take profits if the technical pattern degenerates, e.g., breaks a trendline. The main difference between post-splits and pre-splits plays is that we really have to like the pattern. Pre-splits can run right before their splits even with poor technical indicators. For post-splits, we are looking at the stocks from more of a longer term "would I buy this stock at this juncture?" position. Now there are times when a hot stock splits and investors pile in to get in while the stock is 'cheaper.' We play those, but with more of a short-term, pre-splits mentality in that we will be ready to get out fast if the momentum fades. Remember, everything we do has to pass muster with the market that day ... don't fight the market on these plays. stock split interview on CNBC-TV [ Broadband | Dial-up ] Here's a post-split play and our current analysis.
Company Profile EARNINGS: Late January 2009 STATUS: Test 18 day EMA. EPIQ made us some good money over the last few weeks. Then it started to test on some rising volume so we took all the gain off the table to see how it held and if it would give us a new buy. It is holding at near support at the 18 day EMA (16.16), and it has shown some increasing volume as it tests and holds this level. That can indicate that buyers are stepping up. We will simply let EPIQ show us if it is ready to continue its move by giving a bounce upside on strong volume. EPIQ is one of the small business service stocks that came off the October low with a vengeance and was an early leader. This test could give it the rest it needs to send it upside once more. Volume: 505.577K Avg Volume: 360.605K BUY POINT: $16.77 Volume=545K Target=$19.88 Stop=$15.84 POSITION: FQU DC - Apr. $15c (67 delta) &/or Stock Learn more about our Stock Split Report and how we have made gains of 321% with our powerful stock split plays!
| ||
|
| ||
APA (Apache--$74.57; +4.76; optionable): Independent oil and gas
| ||
RBA - Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Inc. is currently trading at $22.52. The January $22.50 Calls (RBAAX) are trading at $1.20. That provides a return of about 6% if RBA is above $22.50 on expiration Friday in January.
Learn more about our Covered Call Tables - 8 Tables Updated 5 Times Per Week | ||
Stock Split Report: Forbes.com Best of the Web Covered Calls: 8 Tables with nightly updates - energize your portfolio! Tech Traders: Breakouts, wedges, etc...focusing on stocks ready to move now! The Daily: "The Daily" is a must read for all investors! | ||
|
The foregoing is commentary for informational purposes only. All statements and expressions are the opinions of Online Investment Services, LP., or Split Ventures, Ltd. This information is not meant to be a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. We are not licensed or registered in the securities industry. The information presented herein and on the related web site has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. The security portfolios of writers for this issue may, in some instances, include securities mentioned herein and on the related web site. Estimates, assumptions and other forward-looking information are subject to the limits of forecasting. Actual future developments may differ materially due to many factors. No one associated herewith receives compensation in any manner from any of the companies that are discussed in this newsletter or on the related websites. This email was sent to ~~EMAIL~~. | ||
|